Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2826 FEHA claims are arbitrable and may be subject to an arbitration clause in an employment agreement, but an agreement that lacks mutuality and limits the employee's remedy is tainted by unconscionability and void in its entirety.CitationARMENDARIZ v FOUNDATION HEALTH (Unconscionable Restriction) 24 C4 83 [See: CCP 1280 etseq; Stirlen v Supercuts 51 CA4 1519, T/AT 3/97; Broughton v Cigna 21 C4 1066, T/AT 1/00; CivC 1670.5, 1598, 1599] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||