|
2692 REVIEW GRANTED Public statements by Nike concerning working conditions in Asian factories where its products are made referred to matters of public concern and thus were protected by the First Amendment, which justified dismissal of an action for unfair competition based on those statements.CitationKASKY v NIKE (Asian Factories) 79 CA4 165 [See: B&PC 17200 etseq; Bigelow v Virginia 421 US 809; Va Pharmacy Bd v Va Consumer Council 425 US 748; Florida Bar v Went for It 515 US 618; Bolger v Youngs 463 US 60]
|
|
