|
2579 DEPUBLISHED In the absence of evidence that plaintiffs were registered voters who received ballot materials or had read newspaper accounts of a ballot measure, a highway expansion bond issue that appeared on the ballot and media attention given to it did not place plaintiffs on constructive notice that a highway was to be expanded, or start the statute of limitations running on their fraud claim against a defendant who allegedly concealed the highway project from them when selling them real property.CitationMcGILL v BROCK (Concealed Highway) 76 CA4 1396 [See: CCP 338(d); Hobart v Hobart 26 C2 412; Stutz Motor Car v Reebok 909 FS 1353; United Klans v McGovern 621 F2 152]
|
|
