Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2769 A supplier of telecommunication services can not be liable for breaching a promise that is inconsistent with the terms of a tariff filed with and approved by the FCC, and if the tariff provides that cancellation of an order is the exclusive remedy, no action for damages can be brought against the supplier.CitationDUGGAL v FUTURE TELCOM (Bulk Phone Service) 81 CA4 81 [See: 47 USC 203; AT&T v Central Office 524 US 214] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||