|
2882 A defendant who increases the inherent risks of an activity is not protected by the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk; an employer who has failed to secure payment of workers' compensation benefits by either purchasing insurance or self-insuring as provided in the Labor Code may be liable in tort for an employee's job related injuries, even if the employee received workers' compensation benefits from another source; a public entity may be liable for injuries resulting from a dangerous condition of its property created by privately owned equipment temporarily installed on the public property with the public entity's consent.CitationHUFFMAN v CITY OF POWAY (Trap Door) 84 CA4 975 [See: Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296, T/AT 10/92; Bush v Parents 17 CA4 322, T/AT 9/93; Branco v Kearny 37 CA4 184, T/AT 9/95; Morgan v Fuji 34 CA4 127, T/AT 5/95; LabC 3602, 3706, 3700; Hernandez v Chavez 235 CA3 1092; Strickland v Foster 165 CA3 114; GovC 835; Chavez v County 229 CA2 387; Branzel v City 247 CA2 68]
|
|
