|
2784 REVIEW DENIED Under an employer's liability policy covering claims for personal injury but excluding claims for wrongful termination, the insurer had no obligation to defend against a former employee's claim that the employer terminated her in retaliation for complaints she made about noxious fumes in the workplace, which claim sought damages for lost earnings as a result of the termination, but did not seek damages for injuries resulting from exposure to the fumes.CitationCULLIGAN v SCIF (Fumes Termination) 81 CA4 429 [See: Horace Mann v Barbara B 4 C4 1076, T/AT 5/93; Producers Dairy v Sentry 41 C3 903; La Jolla v Industrial Indem 9 C4 27, T/AT 1/95]
|
|
