Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2601 REVIEW DENIED A plaintiff suing for attorney malpractice must show with particularity that s/he would have been better off without the allegedly negligent advice of the defendant attorney, and speculation about when a case would have gone to trial is not sufficient to satisfy this burden.CitationCARLTON v QUINT (Pure Fantasy) 77 CA4 690 [See: Marshak v Ballesteros 72 CA4 1514, T/AT 7/99; CCP 1011; Tate v Superior Court 45 CA3 925; Alliance v Murray 161 CA3 1] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||