Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2662 The design and location of yardage markers on a golf course did not increase inherent risks of the sport and so the operator of the course was protected by primary assumption of the risk from liability to a golfer who was struck by an errant ball that ricocheted off one of the markers.CitationAMERICAN GOLF CORP v SUPERIOR COURT (A/R Golf Markers) 79 CA4 30 [See: Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296, T/AT 10/92; Dilger v Moyles 54 CA4 1452, AT 6/97; Morgan v Fuji 34 CA4 127, T/AT 5/95] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||