Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2874 REVIEW DENIED Discovery of an allergic reaction to latex gloves did not start the statute of limitations running on a claim that the gloves contained toxic chemicals that caused the allergic reaction.CitationCLARK v BAXTER HEALTHCARE (Latex Gloves) 83 CA4 1048 [See: CCP 340; Jolly v Eli Lilly 44 C3 1103; Norgart v Upjohn 21 C4 383, T/AT 9/99] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||