Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2564 Although CCP 1008 prevents a court from considering a party's motion for reconsideration of a prior order in the absence of new facts, circumstances, or law, it does not prevent a court from doing so on its own motion.CitationDARLING, HALL... v KRITT (Sua Sponte Reconsideration) 75 CA4 1148 [See: Strick v Superior Court 143 CA3 916; Garcia v Hejmadi 58 CA4 674; Pender v Radin 23 CA4 1807, T/AT 5/94; Bernstein v Consolidated 37 CA4 763; Nave v Taggart 34 CA4 1173] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||