Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2231 The Santa Monica rent control ordinance is constitutional, even if it failed to accomplish its stated purpose, so its enforcement did not result in a taking for which just compensation is required or result in liability for inverse condemnation.CitationSANTA MONICA v SUPERIOR COURT (Rent Control) 19 C4 952 [See: Nollan v CA Coastal Comm 483 US 825; Kavanau v SM Rent Control Bd. 16 C4 761; Pennell v City 485 US 1] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||