|
2432 A hypothetical future lease resting on the probability of renewal is not a compensable property right, so a claim that pre-condemnation conduct by a public entity discouraged plaintiff from negotiating the renewal of its lease on a golf course does not support an action for inverse condemnation.CitationSD METRO v HANDLERY (Golf Course Lease) 73 CA4 517 [See: Stroh v Alaska SHA 459 P2 480; US v Petty 327 US 372; Scully v US 409 F2 1061; Bagford v Ephraim 904 P2 1095; City of LA v Lowensohn 54 CA3 625]
|
|
