Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2427 Independent attorneys representing the same client, one as insurance defense counsel and the other as Cumis counsel, have no right of indemnity against each other for liability resulting from malpractice.CitationKROLL & TRACT v PARIS & PARIS (Lawyer Indemnity) 72 CA4 1537 [See: Austin v Superior Court 72 CA4 1126, T/AT 7/99] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||