- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
Case Summary |
|
2397 REVIEW DENIED Under a Blue Cross contract that provided for renewal every three months and permitted modification upon renewal, the insured did not have a vested right to benefits available under her original contract, and, upon renewal, Blue Cross was entitled to modify the contract to eliminate those benefits.CitationWILLIAMS v CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS' (Blue Cross Modification) 72 CA4 722 [See: Sarchett v Blue Shield 43 C3 1; Fraker v Sentry 19 CA4 276, T/AT 12/93] |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||