|
2224 REVIEW DENIED By approving a plan for resurfacing the span of the Golden Gate Bridge, the Bridge District approved a design; since the district was guided by recommendations from various consultants, the design could have been approved by a reasonable body, and the District was therefore immune, under GovC 830.6, from liability.CitationSUTTON v GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE DIST (Golden Gate Bridge) 68 CA4 1149 [See: GovC 830.6; Grenier v City 57 CA4 931, T/AT 10/97; Compton v City 12 CA4 591, T/AT 3/93; Higgins v State 54 CA4 177, T/AT 5/97; Ramirez v City 192 CA3 515]
|
|
