Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2223 A plaintiff who sued an attorney and client, claiming that the client "acting by and through" the attorney had maliciously prosecuted a civil action against it, did not thereby allege civil conspiracy and was not required to comply with the Attorney Civil Conspiracy statute (CivC 1714.10).CitationWESTAMCO v LEE (Attorney Conspiracy) 69 CA4 481 [See: CivC 1714.10; Norton v. Hines 49 CA3 917; Weaver v Superior Court 95 CA3 166; Wolfrich v USAA 149 CA3 1206; Hung v Wang 8 CA4 908, T/AT 10/92] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||