Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2190 REVIEW DENIED A government agency's erroneous order preventing plaintiffs from developing part of their residential property did not result in a taking requiring just compensation, because it did not completely render the property economically non-viable.CitationBUCKLEY v CA COASTAL COMM (Wrong Agency) 68 CA4 178 [See: US Const Am.5, 14; Cal Const I, 19; US v Riverside 474 US 121; Landgate v CA Coastal Comm 17 C4 1006] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||