Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2379 Even though the testimony of plaintiff's experts as to causation was uncontroverted by expert testimony on behalf of defendant, plaintiff was not entitled to a directed verdict, because the testimony of plaintiff's experts could furnish substantial evidence to support a jury's verdict for defendant.CitationHOWARD v OWENS CORNING (Uncontradicted Experts) 72 CA4 621 [See: Abbott v Taz 67 CA4 853, T/AT 12/98] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||