|
2320 REHEARING GRANTED (SEE # 2367) Neither an attorney's statements characterizing an offer of compromise under CCP 998 as "insulting and demeaning," nor a notice of intention to orally argue in opposition to a court's temporary ruling on a motion for summary judgment, constituted a rejection of the offer and, upon subsequent acceptance of the offer, the trial court should have entered judgment enforcing the compromise.CitationGUZMAN v VISALIA COMMUNITY BANK (Insulting Demeaning Offer) 71 CA4 135 [See: Poster v SCRTD 52 C3 266; TM Cobb v Superior Court 36 C3 273]
|
|
