Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2418 REVIEW DENIED The testimony of an expert regarding the phenomenon of repressed memory may be admitted into evidence without satisfying the requirements of the Kelly-Frye test.CitationWILSON v PHILLIPS (Repressed Memory) 73 CA4 250 [See: CCP 340.1; People v Kelly 17 C3 24; Frye v US 293 F 1013; People v McDonald 37 C3 351; Ramona v Superior Court 57 CA4 107, T/AT 9/97; Schall v Lockheed 37 CA4 1485, T/AT 10/95; Trear v Sills 69 CA4 1341, T/AT 3/99] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||