|
2357 Evidence that plaintiff was legally blind and initialed loan documents after being assured that they were nothing more than authorizations to obtain information regarding the payoff amount of her current home loan was sufficient to support the trial court's conclusion that the agreement and arbitration clause that it contained were obtained by fraud and to justify its denial of a petition to compel arbitration of plaintiff's fraud claim against the purported lender and its agents.CitationJONES v ADAMS (Blind Borrower) 71 CA4 831 [See: Rosenthal v Great Western 14 C4 394]
|
