Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2263 A false statement about plaintiff made during a television broadcast was sufficiently negated by subsequent statements made during the same broadcast and reflecting on the previous statement's falsity to prevent plaintiff from making out a case of defamation, and therefore justified granting defendant's SLAPP motion.CitationMONTEREY PLAZA HOTEL v HOTEL EMPLOYEES UNION (Union Activity) 69 CA4 1057 [See: CCP 425.16; McNair v Hearst 494 F2 1309; Alszeh v HBO 67 CA4 1456, T/AT 1/99] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||