Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2287 DEPUBLISHED Although a trial judge's determination that an insurer had no duty to defend was reversed on appeal, it was a reasonable conclusion for the trial judge to reach, and since it was similarly reasonable for the insurer to reach the same conclusion, its refusal to defend was not based on bad faith.CitationFRI HOLDINGS v HARTFORD (Reasonable Judge) 70 CA4 1023 [See: Egan v Mutual 24 C3 809; Brinderson v Pacific 971 F2 272; Garriott v Superior Court 221 CA3 783] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||