|
2228 REVIEW DENIED An insurer that exercised its right to terminate a general agent for cause did not thereby engage in conduct that was independently wrongful as to brokers who did business with the general agent and were damaged by the termination and, therefore, was not liable to them in an action for interference with prospective economic advantage.CitationLANGE v TIG INS (Short Notice) 68 CA4 1179 [See: J'Aire v Gregory 24 C3 799; LiMandri v Judkins 52 CA4 326, T/AT 3/97; Della Penna v Toyota 11 C4 376, T/AT 12/95; National Medical v Deloitte & Touche 62 CA4 412, T/AT 4/98]
|
|
