2236 During discovery, if no questions are asked of plaintiff that would require plaintiff to identify a particular defendant as a cause of his/her injuries, plaintiff's failure to identify that defendant does not establish plaintiff's inability to connect that defendant with the injury and does not satisfy defendant's burden of proof in moving for summary judgment.CitationSCHEIDING v DINWIDDIE (No Reference) 69 CA4 64 [See: CCP 437c; Union Bank v Superior Court 31 CA4 573, T/AT 2/95; Hunter v Pacific 37 CA4 1282, T/AT 10/95; Lloyd's v Superior Court 56 CA4 952, T/AT 8/97; Rio Linda USD v Superior Court 52 CA4 732, T/AT 397; Lopez v Superior Court 45 CA4 705, T/AT 6/96; Leslie G v Perry 43 CA4 472, T/AT 4/96; Brantley v Pisaro 42 CA4 1591, T/AT 4/96; Villa v McFerren 35 CA4 733, T/AT 7/95]
|
|