|
2395 REVIEW DENIED An action against an insured based on the negligent sale of strawberry plants that previously had been exposed to toxins and that resulted in loss of crop by commercial growers alleged an "incident" (i.e., the sale) and "property damage" (i.e., loss of use of the growers' land), and so the insurer had a duty to defend under a liability policy that covered property damage resulting from an incident.CitationHENDRICKSON v ZURICH (Toxic Strawberries) 72 CA4 1084 [See: Borg v Transamerica 47 CA4 448; Armstrong v Aetna 45 CA4 1, T/AT 6/95]
|
|
