Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2482 REVIEW DENIED In determining a claim, under the Unfair Practices Act, that defendant sold advertising space in a newspaper below cost to destroy competition, the cost of the advertising space involved was a proper question for a jury and should not have been determined as a matter of law by the court.CitationPAN ASIA v HEARST CORP (Advertising Cost) 74 CA4 424 [See: B&PC 17043; Turnbull v ARA 219 CA3 811; GHII v MTS 147 CA3 256] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||