Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2365 A peremptory challenge to a discovery referee, filed before the scheduling of any additional proceedings before the referee and more than five days before a hearing, was timely, so a motion for disqualification of the referee based on the challenge should have been granted.CitationPEDUS v SUPERIOR COURT (Challenged Referee) 72 CA4 140 [See: CCP 170.6; Autoland v Superior Court 205 CA3 857] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||