2386 Fraudulent bids at a foreclosure sale, which deprived plaintiff of payment to which it was entitled, did not support an action for fraud, since plaintiff was not damaged by reliance on any misrepresentation by defendant, but the trial court should have permitted amendment of the complaint to include actions for conversion and violation of CivC sections regulating foreclosure sales.CitationSOUTH BAY BUILDING v RIVIERA (Rigged Foreclosure) 72 CA4 1111 [See: CivC 2924h; FPCI v E & G 207 CA3 1018; Laczko v Jules Meyers 276 CA2 293; Michael R v Jeffrey B 158 CA3 1059]
|
|