|
2277 REHEARING GRANTED An attorney's belief that his client could sue an insurer without cross complaining in an interpleader action brought by the insurer against his client and another person who claimed against policy proceeds was excusable, and justified reopening the interpleader action after it was voluntarily dismissed by the insurer.CitationSTATE FARM v PIETAK (Dismissed Interpleader) 70 CA4 103 [See: CCP 473, 426.10, 426.30; Yeap v Leake 60 CA4 591, T/AT 2/98; McCormick v Board 198 CA3 352]
|
|
