Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2271 REVIEW GRANTED Actions and reports of a hospital staff peer review committee convened to find the cause of a problem and to prevent it from recurring are inadmissible as evidence of subsequent remedial measures.CitationFOX v KRAMER (Remedial Peer Review) 70 CA4 177 [See: EvC 1151; Turner v Hearst 115 C 394; Webster v Orr 174 C 426; City v Superior Court 33 CA3 778] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||