|
p1595 The trial court erred by holding that California jurisdiction was unreasonable in a case where the assignee of a cause of action was a resident of the same foreign jurisdiction as all of the defendants in the case. The appropriate inquiry was whether subjecting the defendants to personal jurisdiction in California comported with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.CitationEPIC COMMUNICATIONS v RICHWAVE TECHNOLOGY (Minimum Contacts), 179 CA4 314 [See International Shoe Co. v Washington 326 U.S. 310 (1945); Burger King Corp v Rudzewicz 471 U.S. 462; Pavlovich v Superior Court 29 C4 262, P/AT 01/03]
|
|
