Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
4830 REVIEW DENIED Aggravation of a plaintiff's allergies and asthma leading to three bouts of pneumonia as an alleged result of exposure to second hand smoke is sufficiently different in kind from increased risk of heart disease and lung cancer suffered by the general public to permit plaintiff to maintain a private action for public nuisance.CitationBIRKE v OAKWOOD (Secondhand Smoke) 169 CA4 1540 [See: CivC 3479, 3480, 3493; Venuto v Owens-Corning 22 CA3 116; Lind v City of SLO 109 C 340] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||