|
P1522 In the arbitration of a city employee's claim that she was improperly laid off, the arbitrator's award indicating that the employee was to be reinstated and made whole, but failing to specify the position to which she was to be reinstated or what it would take to make her whole, lacked sufficient specificity to be enforceable as a judgment; however, the arbitrator had not failed to decide any of the issues before her; rather than vacating the award, the trial court should send it back to the arbitrator for more specific resolution.CitationMOSSMAN v CITY OF OAKDALE (Nonspecific Award) 170 CA4 83, [See: CCP 1280 etseq; Moncharsh v Heily 3 C4 1]
|
|
