Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p1594 The trial court erred by holding that a forensic report of a driver's blood alcohol content (BAC) did not meet the requirements of the public records exception to the hearsay rule. Although the report was not made “at or near the time” of the BAC test, the report was merely a printed record of test results that were analyzed and reported at the time the test was performed.CitationLEE v VALVERDE (DUI) 178 CA4 1069 [See EvidCode §1280; Miyamoto v DMV 176 CA4 1210; Molenda v DMV 172 CA4 974] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||