|
p1592 Multiple defendants in a personal injury case could exchange information without waiving any privileges because they had a common interest. It was proper to disqualify plaintiff's counsel when an attorney who previously had access to shared information came to work for the firm representing plaintiff, and every defendant had standing to move to disqualify the tainted firm. CitationMEZA v MUEHLSTEIN & CO (Tainted Attorney) 176 CA4 969 [See CCP ยง2018.010 etseq; Flatt v Superior Court 9 C4 275; Rules Prof Conduct, rule 3-310(C)(2)]
|
|
