|
P1582 A federal district court was required by the Federal Arbitration Act to enforce an arbitration agreement that called for cost splitting because the dispute was within the scope of the agreement, and the agreement was not unconscionable insofar as the parties opposing arbitration failed to prove that at the time of signing, fees and costs would have made arbitration prohibitively expensive. CitationMONEX DEPOSIT CO v GILLIAM (Unconscionable Arbitration in Federal Court) 671 FSupp2 1137 (C.D.Cal) [See Parada v Superior Ct 176 CA4 1554; Jackson v Rent-A-Center 581 F3d 912]
|
|
