Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
4889 Under the nondelegable duty rule, a landholder is vicariously liable for the negligence of a contractor hired to maintain the premises, so no Proposition 51 apportionment of fault between them is required.CitationKOEPNICK v KASHIWA (Falling Elevator) 173 CA4 32 [See: LabC 7311.1, 7324.1; CivC 1431.2; Srithong v Total 23 CA4 721, T/AT 4/94] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||