|
P1523 REVIEW DENIED By voluntarily appearing in an arbitration proceeding that included prehearing discovery, an attorney subjected him/herself to the jurisdiction of the arbitration panel and was subject to its rulings, including the imposition of sanctions for discovery abuse committed by failing to return materials subject to privilege that had been inadvertently disclosed, until after reviewing them, copying them, creating a spreadsheet based on information culled from them, and sending copies to the arbitration panel.CitationBAK v MCL (Inadvertent Disclosure) 170 CA4 1118 [See: CCP 128.5; Moncharsh v Heily 3 C4 1, SCIF v WPS 70 CA4 644, T/AT 4/99; Cable v DIRECTV 44 C4 1334, P/AT 11/08; David v Abergel 46 CA4 1281, T/AT 8/96]
|
|
