Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
4957 -REVIEW DENIED- The boilers qualified as military equipment for purposes of the government contractor defense; however this defense does not immunize the manufacturer from a failure to warn claim. But, because the jury findings were inconsistent, the case must be remanded.CitationOXFORD v FOSTER WHEELER LLC (Asbestos in the Boiler) 177 CA4 700 (RevDen) [See: Boyle v United Technologies Corp. 487 U.S. 500; Tate v Boeing Helicopters 55 F3 1150; Hasson v Ford Motor Co. 19 C3 530] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||