|
4888 REVIEW DENIED In selling an insurance policy to plaintiff's wife, defendant insurer owed no duty to plaintiff; the facts that plaintiff advised his wife to buy the policy, that it was purchased with community funds, and that plaintiff would have been a beneficiary of it did not impose on the insurer a duty to plaintiff.CitationMEGA LIFE v SUPERIOR COURT (Misrepresented Benefits) 172 CA4 1522 [See: Small v Fritz 30 C4 167 T/AT 5/03; Hatchwell v Blue Shield 198 CA3 1027; Austero v National Cas 62 CA3 511; Auto Equity Sales v Superior Court 57 C2 450]
|
|
