|
4848 Uninsured Motorist coverage in a policy that provided it to the named insured and spouse, and residents of the same household who are relatives of either, and any other person while in, or entering, or alighting from an insured motor vehicle did not apply to the named insured’s fiancé who was listed as an additional insured and resided in the named insured’s household, but was not related to her and was injured as a pedestrian, when struck by an uninsured vehicle.CitationMERCURY INS v PEARSON (Additional Insured) 169 CA4 1064 [See: InsC 11580.2; Bank of the West v Superior Court 2 C4 1254, T/AT 9/92]
|
|
