Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
4962 Where a contract between a prospective buyer and seller was effectively cancelled, yet the buyer still reaped all the benefits under the contract without paying for it, a stated cause of action for breach of contract would support recovery of unjust enrichment and a stated “intentional tort” cause of action would support recovery for either conversion or trespass.CitationHERNANDEZ v LOPEZ (Stealing the Restaurant) 180 CA4 932 [See: Dunkin v. Boskey 82 CA4 171(2000)] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||