|
4952 -REVIEW DENIED- In a §1983 claim by a physician that his civil rights were being violated by baseless investigations into physician's practices regarding prescriptions for medical marijuana, the Supervisor of the State Medical Board was entitled to qualified immunity in part because the law regarding appropriate use of marijuana for medical purposes is not well established.
CitationBEARMAN v, CAL MED BD (Marijuana) 176 CA4 1588 [See: Bearman v. Superior Court, 117 CA4 463; 42 USC § 1983; H&SC 11362.5]
|
|
