|
4864 REVIEW DENIED The supplier of equipment with asbestos parts has no duty to warn about hazards that might be associated with replacement parts subsequently supplied by others; equipment with asbestos parts is not defective solely because it lacked a warning about hazards that might be associated with replacement parts subsequently supplied by other suppliers.CitationTAYLOR v ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY (Asbestos Replacement) 171 CA4 564 [See: Peterson v Superior Court 10 C4 1185, T/AT 10/95; Daly v GM 20 C3 725; Anderson v Owens-Corning 53 C3 987; Rowland v Christian 69 C2 108]
|
|
