Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
P1542 Factual determinations previously made in connection with discovery motions did not relate to the merits of the case, so a timely request for peremptory disqualification of the trial judge under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6 should not have been rejected because of them.CitationSWIFT v SUPERIOR COURT (Peremptory Challenge) 172 CA4 878 [See: CCP 170.6; Zilog v Superior Court 86 CA4 1309, P/AT 3/01; Stephens v Superior Court 96 CA4 54, P/AT 3/02] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||