|
4955 -REVIEW DENIED- The attorney/respondents' actions in revising the deceased's estate plan, attempting to implement the revised plan through probate court, and defending the Cabral family in litigation were all protected activities under the anti-SLAPP statute. Furthermore, the plaintiff could not establish a probability that she would prevail on her cause of action.
CitationCABRAL v MARTINS (Hiding the Child Support) 177 CA4 471 (RevDen) [See: SLAPP, CCP 425.16; Cabral v. Soares 157 CA4 1234; child evasion statutes, CivC 1714.4 & 1714.41; Paul for Council v. Hanyecz 85 CA4 1356; Flatley v Mauro 39 C4 299; CivC 47(b)]
|
|
