Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0698 An attorney who told the California Supreme Court he would be present for oral argument and then failed to appear because he was no longer employed by the firm representing a party and had informed the firm about the oral hearing was properly held in contempt and fined.CitationIn re AGUILAR and KENT on Contempt (Non-Appearance) 34 C4 386 [See: CCP 1209; B&PC 6068; Rules of PC 5200; Lyons v Superior Court 43 C2 755; In re Ciraolo 70 C2 389] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||