p0659 REVIEW GRANTED In an action by a wife against her husband based on the claim that he concealed from her the fact he was HIV positive and his previous homosexual relationships, the reason for discovering identities of his former sex partners was too speculative to overcome privacy considerations, but disclosure could be compelled of general information about the nature of his previous sexual experiences; the husband's claim that his wife infected him placed his medical history in issue and was a waiver of his privacy interest in his medical records.CitationJOHN B v SUPERIOR COURT (Marital AIDS) 121 CA4 1000 [See: CCP 2017; Fults v Superior Court 88 CA3 899; Boler v Superior Court 201 CA3 467; Kathleen K v Robert B 150 CA3 992; Doe v Roe 218 CA3 1538]
|
|