Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0599 An amendment to the anti-SLAPP law prohibiting its application to actions arising from statements made to market a product or service may be applied to actions that arose before it went into effect.CitationMETCALF v UHAUL (Retroactive SLAPP) 118 CA4 1261 [See: CCP 425.16, 425.17; Robertson v Rodriguez 36 CA4 347, T/AT 8/95; Brenton v Metabolife 116 CA4 679, T/AT 4/04, P/AT 5/04] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||